All I know is that I don't know. |
|
|
All I know is that I don't know nuthin'.  Links and whatnot Blogs and FriendsPreacherman Johnny Payphone Mr. Nosuch Teresa Strickland radiohodgepodge Just Cheap Dirt xpurple Fairly Crass Babble Book Staircase Wit Pezman Jack Jackson's Dirty Pictures 2000 Jgrrl's LJ lfirebrand Funny, yet true The Onion Modern Humorist Something Awful X-Entertainment Seanbaby What's Better? Homestar Runner Triumph, the Insult Comic Dog Get Your War On Maakies A Softer World News and stuff Plastic Google News Movies IMDb Roger Ebert Cinema Confidential Rotten Tomatoes Music and Art Pitchfork They Might Be Giants Bongwater Taffy Rate Your Music Rocket From The Crypt The All Music Guide 2.13.61 Publishing Tha Friendly Gangstaz Committee The Wooster Collective Star City Scene OLGA The Terminals oh my god The Zyklon Bees Strawberry Burns Lone Prairie Records eagle*seagull Genuinely Useful Stuff The Straight Dope Adbusters SpamCop Pandamail h2g2 Download.com Analog X The Free World Pilonidal.org 
 Mail me AIM: RawkStah My Profile My MySpace Space  
HOME Archives:  
|
Saturday, August 21, 2004
I had a revelation tonight.
The equivalent of the most irritating bleeding heart liberal is a raging conservative apologist. Q: What's the difference between a bleeding heart liberal and a conservative apologist? A: Liberals don't bring God into their arguments. That's the only difference. Much like the differences between Germany under Hitler and The Soviet Union under Stalin were differences in name only (note that this comes from my not paying that close attention in history ass), the differences between the ultra-left and ultra-right lie only between the talking points that their email subscription lists spew out. They both argue semantics to the bleeding point, their debate tactic is to talk louder than the opponent, and neither one is willing to concede anything. A word of advice: Never argue politics with a zealot. Comments by: YACCS |